Still, ready for the second talk of the day.
Talk 2: 9:40 am: Tracy Slater, "Dark Matter Phenomenology and Indirect Detection"
Looks like a talk on the various anomalies that have been kicking around. In particular, we have a review of the gamma ray line, as well as the recent AMS-02 results and what they say about the long-standing positron excesses.
Dark Matter equals WIMPs for the purposes of this talk, which is fine by me.
The Fermi Line:
- About a year old now.
- Original claim was 3.3 sigma after accounting for the look-elsewhere effect.
- The big question: is it instrumental systematics? On the one hand, Finkbeiner & Su showed that the signal is, to good approximation, only at the galactic centre and in particular not associated with any particular incidence angle.
- Bump also present from Earth limb, and near to Sun. These are troublesome.
The line is also much stronger than would be expected for WIMPs. In particular, limits from low-energy continuum photons severely restrict standard DM candidates, such as the neutralino. I've talked here about a few ways to resolve this inconsistency, and we have a slide full of papers as examples.
Future tests of the line:
- HESS II online now, expected to present results by 2014.
- GAMMA-400, satellite to launch by 2018 ... maybe.
The GeV Excess: I don't think I know this one.
- In Fermi public data, claim of extended region localised around the galactic centre peaking at a few GeV. Ah, this is the legacy of the Goodenough & Hooper paper from a few years ago.
- Near galactic centre, so has been problematic for some time.
- Shown here that spectrum clearly shows the bump only close to the galactic centre, but out to a distance of 5 to 10 degrees from it.
- Seems to fit well with expectations from NFW profile.
- I'm going to have to dig out the relevant paper here, aren't I?
- Comparison to pulsars; this is the usual thing. I've seen similar plots from the pulsar advocates, they always seem a bit better at fitting the data.
I don't know how I feel about this claim. I've generally been skeptical of these whole series of claims, but I don't want to dismiss things out of hand.
Finally we come to the positron fraction excess, and the recent AMS-02 results. New results clearly confirm the PAMELA rise above 10 GeV, contrary to the natural expectation. Of course, a lot of work has already been done back when the PAMELA results first came out. Focus on models with a light dark vector that gives us the Sommerfeld enhancement, and ensures leptonic decays.
Finally we come to the positron fraction excess, and the recent AMS-02 results. New results clearly confirm the PAMELA rise above 10 GeV, contrary to the natural expectation. Of course, a lot of work has already been done back when the PAMELA results first came out. Focus on models with a light dark vector that gives us the Sommerfeld enhancement, and ensures leptonic decays.
- AMS has confirmed PAMELA; it's not a systematic effect or other nastiness.
- The spectrum is slightly softer, which IIRC would weaken some of the constraints on possible DM models.
- Still unable to rule out the pulsar explanation on the basis of the data.
- CMB constraints on late-time annihilations to leptons also in tension with the data.
I think the main point is perhaps the last line on the last slide, the various signals lead us beyond the simple WIMP paradigm. I've been saying for too long that I want to do something with dark matter, I should stop saying it and start doing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment